If aphotograph is a window then a camera is a window-making machine. Thephotographer goes around punching out rectangular holes in the world so that hemight peer through them again at a time and place of his choosing.
And through thesewindows he collects, he sees, notjust what is there framed within, but beyond them; revealing relationshipsbetween himself and his subjects that can be much more meaningful than the mereaesthetics of an image. A photograph can also function as an interpretivemedium that reflects elements of the photographer's subconscious. He does notalways choose for himself what to capture, or what to frame within his windows.Sometimes it is he who is captured.And sometimes his subject chooses him.
Carl Jungbelieved in something called synchronicity- a seemingly chance meeting of our inner awareness and external events that ismeaningful to the observer and cannot be explained by causality. Synchronicityis born out of the idea that everything is connected through a universalsubconscious that manifests itself through the uncanny association of ideas andevents that occur to us when we least expect it. These are the so-calledcoincidences that occasionally present themselves unexpectedly in our lives,causing us to stop and think, did this really just happen? What does this mean?Jung believed that synchronicity occurs when we need it to, that it is bornwithin our subconscious. The implications of this idea are astounding. Ourinner world is connected to our outer world and we are all connected to oneanother. Is art not proof of these connections? Does not the artist plumb thedepths of her subconscious to create a unit of meaning that is both relevant toherself and to others?
Photographyis the most accessible of art forms and though most people do not practicephotography as art it is, by its very accessibility and simplicity, the mostuniversal form of visual expression. But why do we take photographs? What isthe purpose of a photograph? I posit two answers to this question. We takepictures to record, or to reveal. Now, more than year after my plunge intophotography as a personal art form, I am coming to understand that I am moreinterested in the latter.
Photography,for me, is a medium through which I interpret the world and, more importantly,through which I interpret myself. I do not direct the camera; the cameradirects me. If I let it lead and turnoff my filters, if stop trying to control the camera and therefore the image -its output - I discover treasure troves of meaning. The camera is a dowser'swand. It seems to seek out that which is hidden. It leads me, if I let it, todiscoveries about the world and about myself that were previously obscured. Thecamera slows time, allowing me to see much more than I do during the normalcourse of my wanderings and observations. But it does not accomplish this inreal time. Only later, sometimes much later, do I see what the camera wants me to see.
I have noformal training as a photographer, just as I have no training as a writer. I amlargely self-taught. My writing and my photography have developed organicallyand I am thus prone to many failures as I grope in the dark for methods andmeanings. I am the furthest thing from an expert on these two subjects. Themastery that I seek is simply a mastery of myself.
I am notinterested in taking beautiful photographs. While composition, lighting andsubject matter are important, what I seek in a photograph is something that ishidden to me at the moment of its composition, and something that I cannot planfor or explain. Rarely do I go out to seek a specific subject. I generally letthe subject find me. I don't use a tripod, I don't plan or set up shotsbeforehand and I don't manipulate my subjects. I am interested in photographic serendipity- the accidental meeting of camera, light and subject to create an image withlayers of personal meaning. I don't take photographs to please other people. Itake photographs to please myself, and to learn myself. The purpose of myadventures with a camera are therefore more therapeutic and interpretive thanartistic.
Theexperience of photography, for me, begins with a body in motion - my body. Withmy camera in hand I dive into the ocean of the world and I swim. The camera isat once a golden key and a shield. The camera gives me permission to exploreand interact with living things outside of myself, and also those things wedon't normally label as living - rocks, rivers, architecture. My photographybegins with immersion in the dynamic world of light, form, shadow and allthings living and all things dead. Photography, for this photographer, meanssimmering in the soup of existence. I must be out there, and open to thoseineffable connections between spirit and earth, God and man, will-less,ego-less, humble, small, dangerously vulnerable and precariously perched sothat I may see beyond seeing and feel.Photography for me is just another for of feeling. It is my sixth sense.
But there isa whole other element to my photography that comes into play much later. Thephotographic experience, as I have come to understand it, occurs in the momentthe shutter opens AND in the moment far removed from that original event whenthe image is revealed to me after being baked in time.
Photography,like any other form of creative human expression, can be an instrument ofsynchronicity. A photograph can be a synchronic bridge. A photograph can revealmore about the photographer than its subject. It can be a sort of mirror;especially if it is taken subconsciously. My method is to take my camerasomeplace ostensibly interesting and then drift through that location in a sortof low-level fugue. In this way it is like automatic writing or what Jung calledactive imagination. I take photographs of *everything* that draws my attentionand then, later, ideas and meanings reveal themselves that I did not, couldnot, see in real time.
Time + chance + the lens of my understanding = a unit of meaning.
The meaningsI derive from my photographs are wholly unanticipated but entirely relevant tome in the very moment I make the connections. In short, I have come to believe that my shutter will open ona subject in a moment that was waiting for me to capture and reveal it forreasons I can only understand much later.
Thephotograph that accompanies this piece is just such an image. Prior to mysitting down to write this, I had completely forgotten this photograph existed.I have not given it more than a passing glance sine I took it on January 17, 2010.I remember the outing clearly. I remember the day, but I didn't remember thephotograph - until now, when I was browsing through my Aperture library lookingfor an image that stood out from the rest.
I took thisphoto South of Market in San Francisco while waiting for my car windshield tobe replaced. On that day I photographed murals, buildings, cars and otherobjects that caught my attention. Toward the end of the outing I remember thatI was drawn to this pea-green building - the shadows and the light. When I sawmy silhouette pop up on the wall, I raised the camera and clicked. That wasall. I took no others in this location and continued on my way. Now why would Ichoose to take this photograph and why would I choose it for this piece?
Let's behonest, this is not an especially good photograph. The lighting is interesting,sure, and the colors are rich and the shadows compelling. But if I had spent alittle more time here, working various angles, maybe setting up on a tripod, Iwould probably, after taking dozens of shots, have gotten something more artsy,more pleasing to the eye in terms of balance and composition. The trick to goodphotography, they say, is to take lots of pictures in hopes that one or twowill be worthy of the portfolio. But that scattergun approach feels likecheating - cheating oneself. Because maybe the one frame you're meant to takeis that first one, the intuitive composition.
But otherthan those elements just mentioned, this image seems to have little going forit and no meaning. So why then is it special to me? Why was I drawn to it thenand why was I drawn to it again just now?
I happen tolike photographs in which I can see the photographer. I love silhouettes. Whilemost photographers strive to stay invisible there are times when the presenceof the' thief' enhances the image. It is sort of the visual version of writingin first person. The image, as framed in this unique moment of time, existsonly as a result of my being there. My shadow bears witness to my authorship,and we are in communion - light, and light-thief. So this image has meaning, if for no other reason thenbecause I chose it. I framed it and captured it. Like DuChamp's Fountain, this image has significance simplybecause I say it does.
But there ismore going on here than my shadow. If I dig a little deeper I can see somethingeven more interesting. The most obvious is the street sign. Decatur Street.Who, or what, is Decatur? A simple Google search reveals that Decatur is a cityin the State if Illinois. It's most famous resident was Abraham Lincoln, whopracticed law there in 1830. Decatur is also a suburb of Atlanta in the Stateof Georgia. It's most famous resident was Mark David Chapman, the man whomurdered John Lennon. There is also a Decatur Texas and a Decatur Alabama. Allwere named after Stephen Decatur, one of America's first great naval heroes. StephenDecatur was the youngest man to ever attain the rank of Captain. At one time hecommanded the USS Constitution. His service-record during that era was rivaledonly by John Paul Jones. But Decatur's life was cut tragically short. He waskilled in a duel at the age of 41. His last words were "Oh Lord, I am adead man." Notice the Dead End sign below the Decatur Street sign.
Lincoln,Lennon, Decatur. All seemingly minor coincidences. But there's more. It turnsout I took this photograph on Martin Luther King Day which brings to mindanother senseless and unnecessary killing. There are other 'coincidences' too.The fact that my mother was born on Lincoln's birthday, that her mother wasborn just a day after Decatur's and that my father (then a New York Citypoliceman) was present as Mark David Chapman was arrested and booked for killingLennon.
Remember, Istopped here at this corner for just a moment because I was drawn to the color ofthe building and its shadows. I did not notice the sign. Also, as I mentionedearlier, I was here on this street corner only because I was getting thewindshield of my car replaced. A windshield is a transparent sheet of curvedglass designed to protect a driver, ostensibly from wind, but also from otherhazards of the road. It is itself a lens, a means of seeing, of viewing what isbefore us. At this time of my life, as 2010 became 2011, I was emerging fromone of the most difficult years I can remember. I was recently divorced andgrappling with a major life change. I was struggling with issues of self-esteemand direction. I was, at the time, distinctly trying to look at the world, andmyself, anew - I was in the midst of an inner windshield replacement.
If you lookat the image again, to the right and behind the signpost is the only vehiclewhose make and model are identifiable in this image. It is a silver ToyotaSienna - the exact same make and color of car I shared with my ex-wife that Iwound up giving up in our divorce settlement. I drove that car cross-countrytwice on two major moves - one back East and another back to California. It isa car that has great meaning for me in ways I cannot enumerate here. In thephotograph the car is facing the opposite direction, as if leaving. That partof my life is driving away.
Let's getback to Decatur. Upon reading Stephen Decatur's biography further, I discoveredthat he was a man of extraordinary accomplishments who overcame much adversity.As a child he suffered a serious illness that threatened his life, so upon theadvice of his physician he went to sea at a very young age and there herecovered and found his calling. The sea. I, too, was called by the sea at ayoung age, and though I did not become a midshipman at the age of 10 likeDecatur, I spent a good deal of my early formative years on the water in boatsand found there much solace and purpose. Decatur became a naval hero, designedand built ships and died defending his honor. He was the type of man that, as aboy, I had hoped to be - a man of purpose, determination and will. He achievedmuch in his short life, but in the end he died at the hands of his own ego. Ourwill can only carry us so far.
Over thepast few years I have come to believe that the will is an illusion. We donothing alone. It is not through obstinate self-determination that we discoverour true selves, or our true callings. It is through God, or, if that wordmakes you uncomfortable, through a will greater than our own. What that is,what you call it, how it works or why, is a mystery. But it is throughsurrender to that mystery that we discover freedom. That is the moral of Decatur'sstory as I understand it. His life, as glorious as it was, was a dead end. I nolonger wish to be that kind of man.
Art, initself, is a process of revelation. But it is a Rorschach revelation and it canreflect the observer as powerfully as it reflects the artist. Art is a mirror,and like a mirror it does not show us an image of ourselves exactly as theworld sees us. There is a reversal. We see ourselves askew. But it is via thedistortion that we see the truth, if we look for it. The truth of photography,for me, is not just what is visible on the surface of the image, but what liesin the psychic layers beneath. There is much beyond the image in window, as we,the window-makers, punch out the frames in the world we see. The meanings donot always have to be as literal and complex as those I found in the Decaturphotograph above. They can be subtle, drawing more from universal archetypicalthemes - the shared imagery of our dreams. Those are the images I hope toexplore further in my photography and in my never-ending journey to the center ofmyself.
o O o